Chapter 67--Unannounced visit by Lower Saucon Township Police on April 6,2013

 Below is our response letter to the visit made by the Lower Saucon Township Police. As is mention in the texted it created more questions than answers. We believe it was just blowing smoke on the police behalf. Looking for wiggle room rather than resolve. This visit was prompted by our vist to the Northampton County District Attorney's Office on April 5,2013

Lower Saucon Township Police
 Attention

Corporal Connell and Officer Roxberry

We slept on the exchange that occurred on Saturday, 

April 6, 2013 and still believe and feel no sense of 

security that any future harassment/stalking involving 

the Repashes or Brett Schneider will be treated with 

any serious concern as demonstrated in the past. 

The reality that Jesse Repash and Brett Schneider were 

not even interviewed in the report concerning the 

bullet hole in our security light shade doesn't 

fostera sense of security. We suspect, for some reason, 

that they have been protected. Again, we have dozens of

 videos of real gun fire that we believe is staged to 

harass and stalk us. We felt that most every incidence 

of harassment and stalking we discussed was willfully

 minimized to appear to make   us look foolish, 

like a shell game .

It is not unreasonable for us to be suspicious by what 

we believe to be the Lower Saucon Township Police's 

dismissiveness of that bullet hole. Until someone is 

charged for that crime, we will believe, along with 

all who have continued to 

hear of our circumstance and events, that we are in 

harms way. That bullet hole is proof.

We believe that the two most recent police reports 

suppliedto us by the Police are not accurate to the 

degree of information we reported. We need to know who 

is or isn't responsible for creating the ATV path 

through our land near Alpine drive.

Our videos of the event during Hurricane Sandy totally 

discredit the information in the Police report. We have

 a record that  reinforces that it may have been staged 

to create concern. We have a video of earlier in the

 day documenting our future concern of later in the day.

 We still believe that for some reason, 

Jesse Repash 

and Brett Schneider are being protected. As far as 

writing Chris Garges, we mentioned that we have a 

record of writing him before. We believe he was 

evasive and didn't respond to our request for 

information.  We have no reason to believe that it 

would be any different this time. As we mentioned 

about the speed bumps on the shared drive, we saw and 

have video of the township truck 

parked doing work on Nursery Lane on September 10, 

2011 and also have video of the Township truck 

hauling 

a compressor that sealed 4 different drives in our 

neighborhood of 

Alpine Drive on Sept 17, 2011, including Nursery Lane. 

We are also aware of a reluctant witness who saw the 

Township truck hauling the compressor doing the 

sealing of a drive. You 

both expressed serious concern about the added hazard 

for emergency access because of the speed bumps and 

so 

have 

others. But we wonder why Lower Saucon road workers 

are
performing work on private property on weekends? 

As was 

stated, Tom Maxfield never responded to a e-mail 

request for clarification of the township doing work 

on private property.

It is a big disappointment that we believe that 

nothing was really accomplished by the exchange and 

feel no different about our vulnerability and the lack 

of concern. What we believe to be an "in your face" 

performance on the evening of 

our exchange on April 6, only confirmed what we 

believe to be the reality that we are in the 

crosshairs of an obsession/stalking. The interchange 

on April 6 for us, created more questions that answers.

We believe that this is about shooting the messenger 

and 

not getting the message. We are disappointed.

Sincerely

Scott Bolestridge / Jerry Kott